• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Daniel S. Gonzales

What you need to know about Commercial Real Estate | 408.280.0535

  • Home
  • About Daniel S. Gonzales
  • Documents of interest
  • Blog

Think twice before leasing commercial space to “legal” marijuana businesses

September 10, 2014 by Daniel S. Gonzales Leave a Comment

Think twice before leasing commercial space to “legal” marijuana businesses It’s legal in 19 states, and two of those states don’t even require a prescription (Colorado and Washington State), but while marijuana dispensaries and retail outlets may seem to be ideal tenants for “challenging” commercial or retail spaces, experts caution that the status of those marijuana-related businesses under the law is in limbo, and real estate owners could find themselves on the wrong side of a civil forfeiture action.

Selling or growing marijuana

There are two main problems: 1) Selling or growing marijuana (with or without a prescription) is still against federal law, and the local U.S. Attorney’s Office may choose to enforce that law; 2) Although there are specific carve-outs in some states for these dispensaries and retail outlets to operate within the law, not all local law enforcement agencies support their rapid expansion. This could lead to enforcement actions by local agencies on a case-by-case basis.

Sale of marijuana is still a federal crime

According to the United States Justice Department, production, distribution and sale of marijuana is still a federal crime under the Controlled Substance Act (“CSA”), because marijuana is designated a Class I drug (i.e., drugs with no currently accepted medical use and a high potential for abuse). The U.S. Justice Department has now issued guidelines that assign a low priority to cases under the CSA with regard to the operation of facilities that are otherwise legal under state law. However, these are still just guidelines, and do not have the force of law. The bottom line is that it remains up to each U.S. Attorney’s Office to decide which cases to bring within its jurisdiction. In addition, there are exceptions to the guidelines that may be open to interpretation.

The risk of forfeiture

Beyond the risk of actions under the CSA is the risk of forfeiture under the Civil Asset Forfeiture Reform Act of 2000. This federal law allows for the seizure of real estate involved in acts prohibited under federal law, AND civil forfeiture does not necessarily require a judicial proceeding, nor does it require anyone to be charged with a crime.

The federal government isn’t alone in using civil asset forfeiture to discourage the growth of these businesses. Although marijuana is legal under certain conditions in California and New York, state authorities in California took in $181.4 million in revenue from seized property and cash in marijuana cases from 2002 to 2012, followed by New York at $101.3 million.

The growth of medical and recreational marijuana sales

Further, some police authorities have viewed with concern the growth of medical and recreational marijuana sales in states like Colorado and California. In California, the first state in the U.S. to legalize marijuana for medical use (1996), a billion-dollar industry has emerged, with of hundreds of marijuana dispensaries each handling millions of dollars in cash.

The growth of such businesses, and the lack of detailed state-wide standards as to what constitutes a legitimate medical need, has led to a patchwork approach to enforcement and the legal status of such businesses. For example: “San Diego authorities take the view that marijuana dispensaries are illegal and have aggressively prosecuted them.”

While this business segment may be growing and profitable, its legal status remains cloudy, and doing business in this space carries the risk of property loss and other legal sanctions that may be applied arbitrarily.

Filed Under: Cannabis, commercial leases, Commercial Tenants, marijuana

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Search

Sign up for Updates

  • Hidden
    MM slash DD slash YYYY
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Helping you avoid risk, maximize profit, and protect your long term real estate appreciation

Mr. Gonzales is in private practice, providing representation, advice and counsel in complex real estate, corporate, and business transactions on behalf of public and private institutions, businesses, and individuals.

This material has been prepared by Daniel S. Gonzales for informational purposes only and does not constitute advertising, a solicitation, or legal advice. Neither delivery nor transmission of this material or the information contained herein is intended to create, and receipt thereof does not constitute formation of, an attorney-client relationship. The reader should not rely upon this information for any purpose without seeking legal advice from a licensed attorney. The information contained in this material is provided only as general information and is not promised or guaranteed to be correct or complete. Daniel S. Gonzales expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on any or all the contents of this material.

Recent Posts

  • Protracted legal odyssey ends in victory for Lafayette housing development
  • Is CEQA being weaponized against housing development?
  • Can tech automate commercial lease management? Stay tuned
  • Prolific ADA Litigant Shelved?
  • Prop. 15:  Time to switch off the “third rail” of California politics?
Copyright © 2023 Daniel S. Gonzales