• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Daniel S. Gonzales

What you need to know about Commercial Real Estate | 408.280.0535

  • Home
  • About Daniel S. Gonzales
  • Documents of interest
  • Blog

Rent control measures head to Silicon Valley ballots in November

August 9, 2016 by Daniel S. Gonzales Leave a Comment

rent controlExpansion of rent control

Earlier this year, I wrote in this blog about the housing crunch in the San Francisco Bay Area and Silicon Valley, and its effect on a variety of issues in this region, including increased support for the expansion of rent control.  Since that time, this situation has become so critical that it has drawn the national spotlight to a number of the more extreme aspects of this phenomenon as it manifests itself around our environs.

Three Peninsula cities had unveiled plans

When I last reported on the status of efforts in Silicon Valley to advocate for rent control a few months back, organizations in three Peninsula cities—Burlingame, San Mateo, and Mountain View—had unveiled plans to bring initiatives before their voters.   As Election Day gets nearer, it would be a good idea to review where matters currently stand.

Burlingame’s plans

In Burlingame, where the eviction and subsequent death of 97-year-old Marie Hatch sparked a firestorm of controversy, the Burlingame City Council voted unanimously to place a measure on the November 2016 ballot that would overturn Measure T (prohibiting the city council from enacting rent control without voter approval) and enact in its place an ordinance providing for just cause evictions, rent stabilization, and relocation assistance, among other benefits for renters. This action was supported by Burlingame Advocates for Renter Protections, a local tenant’s rights organization, but faced opposition from real estate professionals and property owners.

San Mateo possible rent control

Meanwhile, in San Mateo, rent control proponents were successful in placing a charter amendment initiative on the November ballot that would, if approved, cap rent increases based on CPI and impose a just cause eviction process. Although the city council’s formal action to place the initiative on the ballot was a ministerial act due to of the number of signatures gathered by its supporters, the mayor, the city council, and local property owners took the opportunity at the city council meeting to set forth their concerns about the measure and offer alternative proposals.

Mountain View’s measures

Finally, in Mountain View, there may be two competing measures up for consideration by the voters in November. The Mountain View Tenants’ Coalition has succeeded in gathering sufficient signatures to require the city council to certify that group’s proposed initiative linking rent increases to CPI. At the same meeting in which this initiative is to be formally approved for the ballot, however, the city council will also consider putting a competing measure to a vote that would revive a system of binding arbitration for rent disputes that was previously rejected by the council.

In the interim, local housing prices have hit an all-time high, rising beyond levels reached during the housing bubble.  With these pressures continuing to mount, all you can say is: Stay tuned.

Filed Under: elections, rent control

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Search

Sign up for Updates

  • Hidden
    MM slash DD slash YYYY
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Helping you avoid risk, maximize profit, and protect your long term real estate appreciation

Mr. Gonzales is in private practice, providing representation, advice and counsel in complex real estate, corporate, and business transactions on behalf of public and private institutions, businesses, and individuals.

This material has been prepared by Daniel S. Gonzales for informational purposes only and does not constitute advertising, a solicitation, or legal advice. Neither delivery nor transmission of this material or the information contained herein is intended to create, and receipt thereof does not constitute formation of, an attorney-client relationship. The reader should not rely upon this information for any purpose without seeking legal advice from a licensed attorney. The information contained in this material is provided only as general information and is not promised or guaranteed to be correct or complete. Daniel S. Gonzales expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on any or all the contents of this material.

Recent Posts

  • 2023 update of California ADU laws
  • My own ADU project!
  • ND’s Fitzgerald Institute for Real Estate brings fresh vitality to housing issues
  • Mountain View and Los Altos Hills targeted for “builder’s remedy” projects
  • Protracted legal odyssey ends in victory for Lafayette housing development
Copyright © 2023 Daniel S. Gonzales