• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Daniel S. Gonzales

What you need to know about Commercial Real Estate | 408.280.0535

  • Home
  • About Daniel S. Gonzales
  • Documents of interest
  • Blog

Mountain View and Los Altos Hills targeted for “builder’s remedy” projects

February 22, 2023 by Daniel S. Gonzales 2 Comments

Over the last several years, a plethora of legislation has been adopted in Sacramento with the intention of spurring housing development in California in response to our housing crisis, with a number of these laws being previously noted in this blog.  Hand in hand with these efforts, the Association of Bay Area Governments (“ABAG”), a regional planning agency, has set housing unit development targets for local governments to meet in order to satisfy the demand for housing in this region.  Together, these imperatives place great pressure on cities and counties to authorize more housing construction.

As you may know, January 31 was the deadline set by ABAG for those jurisdictions to adopt housing elements under their general plans that comply with state law, as certified by the California Department of Housing and Community Development (“HCD”).  As reported by the Bay Area Council, a regional economic development organization, most local jurisdictions failed to meet that deadline, an unsurprising fact given the deep roots of California’s housing crisis in local opposition by some cities towards housing development.

Their failure to follow California law means that, pursuant to California’s Housing Accountability Act, these cities and counties may not reject housing development projects on the ground that they conflict with their general plan and zoning ordinance.  This means that project proponents can pursue what is called the “Builder’s Remedy,” in which they may seek and demand approval for housing developments that do not comply with those restrictions.  In addition, if these jurisdictions fail to obtain HCD housing element approval by May 31, 2023, Assembly Bill 1389 requires that they must rezone those sites before they can obtain HCD approval.

Now that ABAG’s January 31 deadline has come and gone, developers throughout the Bay Area are now expected to take advantage of these legal remedies to pursue projects that previously would not have passed muster.  In Mountain View, right next door to where I live in Los Altos, Forrest Linebarger, a local developer, is now seeking to build a 6-story, 85 unit project, including 17 affordable units, located on a half-acre on Tyrella Avenue.  In addition, another developer is asking for Mountain View’s approval to construct a housing project located on Gamel Way pursuant to the builder’s remedy.

Meanwhile, in nearby Los Altos Hills, Mr. Linebarger has also applied for approval to develop two 44-unit condominium projects on two sites on Mora Drive.  Finally, also in Los Altos Hills, Sasha Zbrozek has proposed redeveloping a nearly 2-acre site on Summitwood Road into 15 apartments and 5 townhouses.  While the outcome of these projects remains to be seen, we can be confident that we will see the submission of even more development proposals taking advantage of these legal remedies throughout the Bay Area, until such time, if at all, that the noncompliant jurisdictions manage to cure their defaults with HCD.

Filed Under: housing, housing crisis

Reader Interactions

Comments

  1. Myron Von Raesfeld says

    February 23, 2023 at 10:10 am

    It is going to be fascinating to see how cities and neighborhoods respond to these new developments. With the cost of land in the bay area it is likely that you will see more higher density projects in the more upscale areas of the bay area since it will ultimately be easier for the developer to make a profit in the higher cost areas. In addition, the higher cost areas tend to have larger lot sizes which make it easier to assemble parcels to create profitable developments.

    Reply
    • Daniel G. says

      February 23, 2023 at 11:14 am

      I agree completely, Myron. I also expect to see some cities put up big fights, but it seems like there will be a great deal of pushback from the state.

      Reply

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Search

Sign up for Updates

  • Hidden
    MM slash DD slash YYYY
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Helping you avoid risk, maximize profit, and protect your long term real estate appreciation

Mr. Gonzales is in private practice, providing representation, advice and counsel in complex real estate, corporate, and business transactions on behalf of public and private institutions, businesses, and individuals.

This material has been prepared by Daniel S. Gonzales for informational purposes only and does not constitute advertising, a solicitation, or legal advice. Neither delivery nor transmission of this material or the information contained herein is intended to create, and receipt thereof does not constitute formation of, an attorney-client relationship. The reader should not rely upon this information for any purpose without seeking legal advice from a licensed attorney. The information contained in this material is provided only as general information and is not promised or guaranteed to be correct or complete. Daniel S. Gonzales expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on any or all the contents of this material.

Recent Posts

  • 2023 update of California ADU laws
  • My own ADU project!
  • ND’s Fitzgerald Institute for Real Estate brings fresh vitality to housing issues
  • Mountain View and Los Altos Hills targeted for “builder’s remedy” projects
  • Protracted legal odyssey ends in victory for Lafayette housing development
Copyright © 2023 Daniel S. Gonzales