• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Daniel S. Gonzales

What you need to know about Commercial Real Estate | 408.280.0535

  • Home
  • About Daniel S. Gonzales
  • Documents of interest
  • Blog

Cautions about using Joint Check agreements in construction projects

June 3, 2013 by Daniel G. Leave a Comment

Joint Check agreements“I’ll give you your money as soon as I get mine.” It is a frequently-heard promise around home remodeling and new construction projects, particularly those using subcontractors. “Joint Check Agreements” are an easy way to control the flow of money from payer to general contractor – and in some cases to expedite payments to subcontractors.

But joint check agreements can cause problems for everyone involved, if mishandled.  Talking to a construction attorney might be a great idea before accepting jointly payable checks, or issuing them.

Consider these points:

  1. The joint check rule, adopted by many states, provides that when the payer (perhaps the owner or general contractor) makes a subcontractor and a supplier co-payees, and one party endorses the check over to the other (perhaps to facilitate negotiation), both parties are deemed fully paid, without regard to how the proceeds are actually split.
  2. Sometimes joint checks are actually payable to 3 parties (say, a subcontractor, a lower tier subcontractor and the supplier). It is important to make sure there is no implied liability on the part of the payer to assume the liability for paying the lower tier subcontractors or suppliers.  The responsibility of the payer needs to be explicitly limited.
  3. Don’t assume everyone in the contracting chain is agreeable to joint checks. Take care to negotiate a formal joint check agreement with all parties before you start using them.

Joint checking agreements and using joint checks are effective ways to manage expense control and payments on construction projects. But it is important to set up formal processes to handle them properly. Good communication with all parties involved, and consultation with a construction attorney, is recommended.

Filed Under: Liens on Construction

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Search

Sign up for Updates

  • Hidden
    MM slash DD slash YYYY
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Helping you avoid risk, maximize profit, and protect your long term real estate appreciation

Mr. Gonzales is in private practice, providing representation, advice and counsel in complex real estate, corporate, and business transactions on behalf of public and private institutions, businesses, and individuals.

This material has been prepared by Daniel S. Gonzales for informational purposes only and does not constitute advertising, a solicitation, or legal advice. Neither delivery nor transmission of this material or the information contained herein is intended to create, and receipt thereof does not constitute formation of, an attorney-client relationship. The reader should not rely upon this information for any purpose without seeking legal advice from a licensed attorney. The information contained in this material is provided only as general information and is not promised or guaranteed to be correct or complete. Daniel S. Gonzales expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on any or all the contents of this material.

Recent Posts

  • Protracted legal odyssey ends in victory for Lafayette housing development
  • Is CEQA being weaponized against housing development?
  • Can tech automate commercial lease management? Stay tuned
  • Prolific ADA Litigant Shelved?
  • Prop. 15:  Time to switch off the “third rail” of California politics?
Copyright © 2023 Daniel S. Gonzales