• Skip to main content
  • Skip to secondary menu
  • Skip to primary sidebar

Daniel S. Gonzales

What you need to know about Commercial Real Estate | 408.280.0535

  • Home
  • About Daniel S. Gonzales
  • Documents of interest
  • Blog

California Real Estate Sales Prices Lose Some Privacy Law Protections

October 20, 2014 by Daniel S. Gonzales Leave a Comment

sales-price

Privacy rights

Californians can rightfully boast of the protections accorded their privacy rights under state law. From the California constitution (which, unlike the U.S. Constitution, explicitly recognizes a right of privacy), to the extensive exceptions to public record access laws that prevent the disclosure of personal information, to the broad prohibitions against non-consensual recording of telephone conversations, the State of California has a well-deserved reputation as a vanguard in the protection of personal privacy rights. It appears, however, that a new law going into effect at the end of 2014 will erode these rights in the real estate arena.

Protecting Californians’ privacy rights

A popular tactic in protecting Californians’ privacy rights could be observed in the practice of documenting real estate transactions to prevent disclosure of the purchase price. While real estate deeds (which are public in order to guarantee the transferability and insurability of real property rights) do not disclose the purchase price of the property, the amount of documentary transfer tax must be shown by the taxpayer on the face of the deed pursuant to California Revenue and Taxation Code Section 11932, and this figure could then be used by others to calculate the purchase price of the property. For decades, however, California taxpayers have been able to request that this tax be shown on a separate, unrecorded, paper attached to the deed, which thus prevented prying eyes from computing the purchase price.

This helpful tool for protecting privacy rights is about to be eliminated, however. With little fanfare, Governor Jerry Brown recently signed AB 1888, which requires that any document submitted for recording after December 31, 2014, that is subject to documentary transfer tax must display the tax due on the face of the document, without exception.

Professionals who assist their clients in their real estate transactions who have been used to being able to protect their clients’ privacy in this way should be aware of this change in the law and should make their clients aware of this law before year’s end.

A copy of AB 1888 can be found here.

Filed Under: privacy, privacy rights

Reader Interactions

Leave a Reply Cancel reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Primary Sidebar

Search

Sign up for Updates

  • Hidden
    MM slash DD slash YYYY
  • This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.

Helping you avoid risk, maximize profit, and protect your long term real estate appreciation

Mr. Gonzales is in private practice, providing representation, advice and counsel in complex real estate, corporate, and business transactions on behalf of public and private institutions, businesses, and individuals.

This material has been prepared by Daniel S. Gonzales for informational purposes only and does not constitute advertising, a solicitation, or legal advice. Neither delivery nor transmission of this material or the information contained herein is intended to create, and receipt thereof does not constitute formation of, an attorney-client relationship. The reader should not rely upon this information for any purpose without seeking legal advice from a licensed attorney. The information contained in this material is provided only as general information and is not promised or guaranteed to be correct or complete. Daniel S. Gonzales expressly disclaims all liability in respect to actions taken or not taken based on any or all the contents of this material.

Recent Posts

  • Protracted legal odyssey ends in victory for Lafayette housing development
  • Is CEQA being weaponized against housing development?
  • Can tech automate commercial lease management? Stay tuned
  • Prolific ADA Litigant Shelved?
  • Prop. 15:  Time to switch off the “third rail” of California politics?
Copyright © 2023 Daniel S. Gonzales